The Bivouac of the Dead

The Creation of National Cemeteries After the Civil War
Stones River National Cemetery, Murfreesboro, Tenn.

Stones River National Cemetery, Murfreesboro, Tenn.

Mike Talplacido

The post鈥揅ivil War relocation of Union dead from the battle-ravaged Southern landscape into orderly new national cemeteries by the U.S. Army is partial fulfillment of President Abraham Lincoln鈥檚 promise 鈥渢o care for him who shall have borne the battle.鈥 The lesser-known individual most responsible for this feat is Brevet Lieutenant Colonel and Assistant Quartermaster of Volunteers Edmund Burke Whitman (1812鈥1883), who was also superintendent of national cemeteries. Based in the Military Division of the Tennessee in the Department of the Cumberland, Whitman led this solemn mission over four years with a deep commitment toward finding thousands of remains, selecting land for new cemeteries and methodically reinterring the dead 鈥 all the while creating crucial 鈥渕ortuary records.鈥 His accountability for the dead across the 鈥渋nterminable grave-yard鈥 left in the wake of fighting led to passage of the National Cemetery Act of 1867, the first substantive legislation to define national cemeteries and provide permanent grave markers for those who served. The United States was the first country to do this.

Edmund Burke Whitman
Edmund Burke Whitman Kansas State Historical Association

At the end of Whitman鈥檚 tenure in 1869, he submitted to his superiors a remarkable report that spells out the breadth, timeline, methods, ethics and outcome of the reinterment mission. The mortuary statistics on many of the 130 or so pages are valuable, but the report鈥檚 unique significance is in its illustrations: sketch views and site plats for about 20 national cemeteries in the report, as well as separate, individual 鈥渃emeterial district鈥 maps where the dead were found and their destination national cemetery. Whitman鈥檚 remarkably illustrative report is born of some of his pre-war work.

Whitman, 49, enlisted in the Civil War on July 18, 1862. Older than most volunteers but with an eclectic and suitable background, Captain Whitman was assigned duties in Kentucky, Ohio and Tennessee during the war. Whitman was born in Massachusetts, graduated from Harvard College in 1838 and taught in the East until 1855, when he moved to Lawrence in Kansas Territory as a representative of the New England Emigrant Aid Society. He also farmed and oversaw construction, and in the late 1850s, partnered with surveyor Albert D. Searl in real estate investments. Services offered by 鈥淲hitman & Searl鈥 included mapping farms, bridges and railroads, and 鈥渁rchitectural drawings of every description 鈥 town plats, and historical views of scenes.鈥

Finding the Dead

The U.S. Army had begun to bury its dead at major battle sites in Tennessee before Whitman鈥檚 posting there in December 1865 under Maj. Gen. George H. Thomas, commander of the Department of the Cumberland. Whitman, however, was tasked with the broader scope of 鈥渧isiting battle-fields, cemeteries, and places where Union dead are interred鈥 throughout the military division, which included Alabama, Georgia, Kentucky, Mississsippi and Tennessee.

He oversaw three major expeditions in addition to numerous shorter trips to map the fallen. His findings percolated into 鈥渄efinite cemeterial districts ranged around some central spot, convenient and appropriate,鈥 where a national cemetery was established. The two dozen or so districts were eventually drafted separately by Charles 鈥淐has.鈥 F. Smith, inked on heavy stock in black and filled in with vivid pastel pink, green and blue watercolor washes. The elegant, very small drawings 鈥 most scaled at 32陆 miles per inch 鈥 show geographic features and, in red ink, a flag for the cemetery. Their cheery appearance belies the human mortality they illustrate.

Whitman personally visited 鈥渢he most interesting places and 鈥 most important routes.鈥 He first set out on March 1, 1866, with officers, soldiers and clerks and equipped with 鈥渁 field note-book and a pocket compass.鈥 That May, some of his findings were used to brief a U.S. congressional committee visiting Memphis about the reinterment effort. Before the group left Tennessee, the essence of the 1867 legislation 鈥渨ith many of its details were 鈥 agreed upon,鈥 Whitman later reflected. He was promoted to brevet major the following month and ordered to the 鈥渄uty of locating, purchasing, and establishing National Cemeteries, and preparing Mortuary Records in the Military Division of the Tennessee.鈥 Disinterment began in October 1866, and in January 1867, Whitman was named superintendent of national cemeteries, though technically it was only for the Department of the Tennessee.

Chattanooga National Cemetery, Chattanooga, Tenn.
Chattanooga National Cemetery, Chattanooga, Tenn. Mike Talplacido

To foster consistency, as early as June 1866, Whitman identified four 鈥減rinciples which should govern in the selection of national cemetery sites.鈥 Major battle sites met the first criteria as 鈥渄istinguished localities, of great historical interest鈥 to honor the Union鈥檚 sacrifice. These included three Tennessee cemeteries Thomas authorized in 1863 鈥 first at Chattanooga (five weeks after Lincoln spoke at Gettysburg, Pennsylvania), then and Nashville. Army chaplains Thomas B. Van Horne and William Earnshaw were at work in Nashville when Whitman arrived, and he wrote that they were 鈥渏ustly entitled to the credit of being the pioneers in the work of disinterring the dead in the Division.鈥 This trio of sites also reflect two more principles 鈥 鈥減oints conspicuous 鈥 on the great thorough-fares of the nation鈥 and 鈥渃entral points, convenient of access鈥 鈥 considering their proximity to transportation by waterway, railway and roadway. After the war, Quartermaster General Montgomery C. Meigs directed officers in other military divisions to select burial sites for their Union dead, but it was Whitman who established the broad system of reinterments under the quartermaster鈥檚 authority before it was codified by law.

National Cemetery Sketches and Plats

Whitman approached his final report as akin to what he probably produced in Kansas, pairing technical plats with charming street-view drawings to create a sense of place. This time his collaborator was Philip M. Radford (1820鈥1897), a Nashville-based civil engineer with 鈥渟kill and taste.鈥 Radford made 鈥渁ccurate surveys [and] elaborate sectional plats鈥 of 18 (of 20) national cemeteries, and imaginative views from the perspective of visitors approaching on foot or by carriage. Known photographs of national cemetery landscapes are limited for the late 1860s, so these na茂ve renderings are among the only and earliest views of impermanent wood buildings, gated entrances and burial sections framed by paths and floral beds.

Knoxville Cemetery Map
National Archives

These plats are also significant because they represent one-quarter of all the national cemeteries as of 1872, when reburials were complete. Collectively, this is the largest number of cemetery plans (as a set) the Army produced until an 1892鈥1893 atlas. They show clever, thoughtful designs with labeled features: superintendent鈥檚 lodges (dwelling and office), a 鈥渉ead board house鈥 to store grave markers, a well (鈥減ump,鈥 covered by an ornamental shelter) and a 鈥渟ubstantial and permanent Flag Staff.鈥 About one-third reserve a 鈥渕onumental site鈥 in keeping with Whitman鈥檚 fourth and final principle: that cemeteries should present 鈥渇avorable conditions for ornamentation, so that surviving comrades, loving friends, and grateful States, might be encouraged to expend liberally of their means, for such purposes.鈥

Symmetrical or organic, the designs resulted from the topography and the inclination of the officers in charge. The sinuous layouts at Chattanooga and Marietta, Georgia, are atypical for their adaption to low, natural hills where sections are arranged in concentric rows of graves with inward-facing headstone inscriptions. Conversely, on the even grounds of Corinth and Memphis in Mississippi, graves are organized in grids, and at Knoxville, Tennessee, a single circle is formed by concentric rows of graves. In Kentucky, where moving the dead was challenging, smaller numbers of dead were placed in 鈥淯.S. Burial Lots鈥 at existing cemeteries, such as the romantic rural-style Cave Hill Cemetery (1846) in Louisville, where the government鈥檚 embedded section stands out for its regularity.

The plats also illustrate efforts to organize remains by regiment or state. Typical prioritized tallies in Whitman鈥檚 report begin with the U.S. Army and continue through state regiments, Veteran Reserve Corps, 鈥淐olored Troops,鈥 employees, miscellaneous and, lastly, the unknowns. Black or white, burial as an unknown was the most distressing outcome for the military and loved ones; These burials are often at the cemetery鈥檚 perimeter, even if not labeled on these plats. The plats also show the dead were segregated by race at some cemeteries, where burial sections are labeled 鈥淐olored.鈥 These cemeteries include Memphis, Knoxville and Natchez, Mississippi. No federal policy about segregation in death has been found, but Whitman 鈥 with a personal history of antislavery activism 鈥 was clear. 鈥淣o distinction is to be made in regard to color so far as the removal to the National Cemeteries is concerned,鈥 he wrote in 1867, 鈥渂ut as the colored troops were a distinct organization, it is considered quite proper and in no way an odious distinction to give them burial either in a separate lot or together in the same part of a lot containing both White and Black. In selecting a separate lot they are in every way, to be treated as if they were white soldiers.鈥

鈥淗arvest of Death鈥 by the Numbers

Whitman鈥檚 report contains daunting numbers. His men visited nearly 2,000 distinct localities, including more than 300 places where fighting occurred and hospitals. They found more than 40,000 scattered graves and documented in excess of 10,000 names. They collected remains from 鈥渘o less than 6283 distinct spots,鈥 and ultimately, more than 114,500 remains were reinterred into the Military Division of Tennessee national cemeteries. Fortunately for Civil War researchers, these statistics are elevated through the sketches, plats and cemeterial district maps associated with Whitman鈥檚 final work.

Whitman mustered out of the U.S. Army on July 15, 1868, but as a civilian he worked another year producing the report that 鈥渇ormed the basis of the elaborate system of National Cemeteries.鈥 He died in 1883, and his eulogy by the Society of the Army of the Cumberland was fitting: 鈥淭he beautiful cemeteries of the Southern States will remain a perpetual memorial of Colonel Whitman.鈥

READER NOTE: All quoted material is from Whitman鈥檚 final report or correspondence, if not indicated otherwise. The report and individual district maps are part of the U.S. Army Quartermaster鈥檚 records (RG 92) at the National Archives and Records Administration, Washington, DC, and College Park locations, respectively. Another large map of all Whitman鈥檚 Civil War cemeterial districts is in the collection of Harvard University Library collection (G3861.G54/1866/C4; 1866?), though it is not currently credited to him.